Purity wrote:
From what I've seen, this is drastically increased in recent years.
You clearly have no grasp of the situation, nor it's past. The percentage of outsourcing has actually been steady since around 2000, when previously it had been on the rise. The only option to prevent this is not removing the tax breaks (which are inconsequential when compared to the savings associated with labor), but it would require that the federal government raise impressive tariffs on goods associated with the products, thus raising the end products price for the consumer. This would of course encourage manufacturing jobs back to the United States, but the cost of which would be borne out by the consumers who would see their cheap goods now all go up in price, thus damaging the very people who would be saved in addition to many more.
Quote:
Yes, 3 million jobs compared to the 270 million+ Americans is rather small, but how many of those 270 million are actually a part of the working class?
Ironically less and less are part of the "working class". What the more vocal people are concerned with today is that a larger portion of the "skilled" labor is being outsourced as opposed to the nike shoe manufacturing which has always been outsourced. The fact of the matter is there are workers in other countries who are willing to do the labor for cheaper, in addition to the fact that companies are more globally based now which requires them to have staff in other countries.
Companies like Honda, Toyota, etc.. outsource jobs from Japan to the United States to improve their company image here and allow people to buy products manufactured here, rather than overseas for the exact same reasoning. I don't hear anyone crying foul about this practice however.
Quote:
[
Quote:
That survey only covers companies that have laid off 50 or more workers at one time for 30 days or longer, and so may not be representative of all companies and all job loss. But it gives scant support for Kerry's theme.
That came straight from your article. Those figures aren't a full representation of the facts.
As should be plainly obvious, this only encompasses larger companies shifting resources overseas, which incidentally are the few companies that actually do it. The possibility that your mom and pop operation is going to outsource their grocery packing to India is beyond remote.
Quote:
Quote:
Schultze: In the short run, an increase in offshoring reduces U.S. job growth. But in the long run it improves the standard of living, increases real wages, and increases the country's economic growth.
That was also in your article. What I don't understand is, if this is all well and good, what about those who are no longer receiving a steady income and can no longer meet the required standard of living, hmm? If the job that a certain person specializes in is no longer available, what are they to do? Get a re-education for a new occupation? That is not a reasonable solution to this problem.
You find it unreasonable that someone in an unskilled labor manufacturing job should get job training from the Federal government to get a higher paying job? *blinks unbelievingly* While I'm all for maintaining the stupidity of our workforce, I think our country would be considerably better served by educating our workforce.
Quote:
Be sad all you want. I really don't care. But as I see it, Corporations are outsourcing to keep more money in THEIR pockets while the Average Joe gets a ramrod right up the ass.
You are precisely the individual who those political ads play too, preying on your lack of knowledge and kneejerk reactionary responses. The only thing accomplished by raising tariffs on goods would be to give a nice big RamRod up the average Joe's ass.
Quote:
I don't get my political insight from 30 second protest spots on the TV, I formulate my own opinion based on what I hear from my own parents, teachers, friends, etc. I rarely use the television as a source to formulate my own opinion. So please don't jump to conclusions about me.
I find this hard to believe, as anyone who took a few minutes to actually research the issues at hand would have an incredibly stronger grasp of the situation. You clearly do not.
Quote:
EDIT - I am sorry, I did not know the whole truth behind the whole tax breaks to outsourcing corporations, but you do have to agree that Bush isn't exactly doing much to try and stop this. Sure, it might help in the long run for those who can GET a job, but for those without, what are they to do?
They need to retrain themselves, and take advantage of government assistance, which incidentally you and I are paying for regardless of whether they take advantage of it or not. People who do not wish to better themselves, or take the time to learn a skilled profession beyond a store baggage clerk can continue to suck up the welfare rolls as they have done in the past.