Yarr The Pirate!
https://w.yarrthepirate.com/phpbb3/

Ugh, one step closer to WWIII...
https://w.yarrthepirate.com/phpbb3/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=11728		 Page 1 of 2
Author:  Parade [ Thu Dec 27, 2007 10:13 pm ]
Post subject:  Ugh, one step closer to WWIII...
Quote:
12/27/07: Pakistan opposition leader Benazir Bhutto was killed along with at least 20 others at a campaign rally.
Author:  Mikey [ Thu Dec 27, 2007 11:22 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Ugh, one step closer to WWIII...
Parade wrote:
Quote:
12/27/07: Pakistan opposition leader Benazir Bhutto was killed along with at least 20 others at a campaign rally.


Things are alot more different than before. So a comment like World War 3 is a bit of a stretch. The entire world does not want a world war and trust me its the last thing that'll happen. Especially with nuclear weapons around.
Author:  Parade [ Fri Dec 28, 2007 12:59 am ]
Post subject: 
I wasnt saying it will cause WW3, but the event certainly brings us closer. Your right though, my comment was a little over the edge, I oppologize.
Author:  Computer [ Fri Dec 28, 2007 1:36 am ]
Post subject: 
Ever ask someone who was from Pak how they felt about India...
Author:  Ponuh [ Fri Dec 28, 2007 3:10 am ]
Post subject: 
http://yarrthepirate.com/v-web/bulletin ... ht=war+iii

OH GOD ANOTHER PIECE OF THE PUZZLE IT'S ALL MAKING SENSE NOW

Edit: by the way that's a pretty hilarious thread because atmosphere got so worked up but I hesitated to post it. I hate reading my old posts and I don't feel like I've really become fully conscious until recently haha
Author:  Supafly [ Fri Dec 28, 2007 4:57 am ]
Post subject: 
I'm pro-world war III...is that bad? I view it as population curving.
Author:  Yarr [ Fri Dec 28, 2007 5:04 am ]
Post subject: 
Im still waiting for Canada to attack the USA.
Author:  Supafly [ Fri Dec 28, 2007 5:09 am ]
Post subject: 
Yarr wrote:
Im still waiting for Canada to attack the USA.


why not...Mexico already is.
Author:  Ponuh [ Fri Dec 28, 2007 5:21 am ]
Post subject: 
Supafly wrote:
I'm pro-world war III...is that bad? I view it as population curving.


With the way your label is looking, I'd say you'll need all the living you can get.
Author:  Supafly [ Fri Dec 28, 2007 7:10 am ]
Post subject: 
with your forum responses I may just beat you on that living part Ponuh, but then again, you may wish to die 1st, you're a hard person to figure out. :)
Author:  Kluya [ Fri Dec 28, 2007 11:40 am ]
Post subject: 
Ponuh wrote:
http://yarrthepirate.com/v-web/bulletin/bb/viewtopic.php?t=3443&highlight=war+iii

OH GOD ANOTHER PIECE OF THE PUZZLE IT'S ALL MAKING SENSE NOW

Edit: by the way that's a pretty hilarious thread because atmosphere got so worked up but I hesitated to post it. I hate reading my old posts and I don't feel like I've really become fully conscious until recently haha


You had a lot of good points in that thread. Wow atmosphere was a fucking retard.
Author:  Sunshine [ Fri Dec 28, 2007 12:13 pm ]
Post subject: 
Yarr wrote:
Im still waiting for Canada to attack the USA.


Nah...it'll most likely never happen.
Author:  Eternus [ Fri Dec 28, 2007 12:36 pm ]
Post subject: 
Sunshine wrote:
Yarr wrote:
Im still waiting for Canada to attack the USA.


Nah...it'll most likely never happen.
The US has the most gun owners of any nation. Going into certain US cities is asking for all of the citizens to shoot you if you are an invader. Canada probably will try to be as neutral as possible. It works for the Swiss.
Author:  ChickenNoodleSoup [ Fri Dec 28, 2007 2:00 pm ]
Post subject: 
We'll kill you with our poutine instead.
Author:  Ponuh [ Fri Dec 28, 2007 3:53 pm ]
Post subject: 
No country developed enough to build the boats or cars to get here would attack us because we're the biggest and richest market for their shit. What would Canada do if they couldn't peddle their shitty whisky and hockey sticks on us?
Author:  Viviti [ Fri Dec 28, 2007 4:48 pm ]
Post subject: 
Ponuh wrote:
No country developed enough to build the boats or cars to get here would attack us because we're the biggest and richest market for their shit. What would Canada do if they couldn't peddle their shitty whisky and hockey sticks on us?


Our dollar is dropping so fast, we don't have that safety net for much longer.
Author:  ChickenNoodleSoup [ Fri Dec 28, 2007 5:57 pm ]
Post subject: 
Ponuh wrote:
No country developed enough to build the boats or cars to get here would attack us because we're the biggest and richest market for their shit. What would Canada do if they couldn't peddle their shitty whisky and hockey sticks on us?


We'll continue southward and peddle our wares to the mexicans and slowly kill them with our poutine too silly. Drunk Mexican hockey players. It could work. Just look at Dubai, they have an indoor ski resort.
Author:  Galindar [ Fri Dec 28, 2007 6:18 pm ]
Post subject: 
Crown Royal is from Canada, and its far from shitty. Its actually very good. Its not Scotch, but I'd drink Crown over most American whiskey.
Author:  Reinheld [ Fri Dec 28, 2007 7:54 pm ]
Post subject: 
The dollar dropping in value isn't totally a bad thing. It has actually helped the economy in areas that don't normally see foreign tourism and such. It also increases the amount that the United States exports since other countries will actually buy our shit. Really, the trade imbalances of the last 50 or so years are just correcting themselves now that the world has such an increase in interdependence.

Also, the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America will pretty much ensure neither Canada nor Mexico will ever attack the U.S., all this assassination means is that Bush and the American government is going to have a harder time controlling Pakistan.
Author:  Mikey [ Fri Dec 28, 2007 8:44 pm ]
Post subject: 
I know is going to back fire on me, and one retard or another is going to mention how would i know if i wasn't mexican or whatever the fuck the lame joke is about.

But the current president of Mexico actually made a valid point. Since europe combined its currencies ( The Euro) its done nothing but improve the value of there money. He suggested canada america and mexico do something similar. Would it be worth a shot. Personally I think it sounds interesting o paper but im not so sure.
Author:  Ponuh [ Fri Dec 28, 2007 9:42 pm ]
Post subject: 
Reinheld wrote:
The dollar dropping in value isn't totally a bad thing. I


Oh thank goodness someone here has finally made a point I agree with
Author:  Jimbean [ Fri Dec 28, 2007 10:50 pm ]
Post subject: 
Hasn't the value of the dollar always been dropping? It's called inflamation and it's why things cost double what they did 20 years ago.
Author:  Ponuh [ Fri Dec 28, 2007 10:56 pm ]
Post subject: 
Jimbean wrote:
Hasn't the value of the dollar always been dropping? It's called inflamation and it's why things cost double what they did 20 years ago.


I can't tell if that's a fake post haha.

Inflation--and the value of the dollar dropping in the terms we're talking about is different. The value of currencies in relation to other currencies is determined by demand because we use a floating-point standard now rather than a fixed standard like gold (which is seriously what Ron Paulites want to return to lol)
Author:  Viviti [ Sat Dec 29, 2007 12:21 am ]
Post subject: 
Jimbean wrote:
inflamation


who talked?? :evil:
Author:  Jimbean [ Sat Dec 29, 2007 12:25 am ]
Post subject: 
lol!
Page 1 of 2 All times are UTC - 5 hours
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/